3.5M
Global talent gap
15%
Premium vs general SWE
USD 270K
NYC senior median
0%
Unemployment rate

Cybersecurity Salaries by City

CityCurrencyMid MedianSenior MedianLead Median
New YorkUSD190,000270,000382,000
San FranciscoUSD242,000348,000480,000
LondonGBP83,000128,000192,000
SingaporeSGD118,000175,000252,000
Hong KongHKD452,000658,000938,000
DubaiAED262,000412,000592,000
SydneyAUD140,000195,000268,000
TokyoJPY10,600,00016,500,00024,000,000
ZurichCHF182,000272,000385,000

💡 Cybersecurity professionals earn a consistent 10–20% premium over equivalent-level software engineers in every market we benchmark. The premium is highest in financial services and government, where regulatory requirements create non-negotiable demand for qualified security staff.

Specialisation Premiums Within Cybersecurity

The CISO Premium

Chief Information Security Officers at major companies sit in a compensation tier well above the lead/principal engineer level. At banks and large enterprises, CISO compensation in APAC ranges from SGD 350–600K in Singapore to HKD 1.5–3M+ in Hong Kong. The role has evolved from a technical leadership position to a board-level executive role with regulatory visibility, and the pay reflects that transition.

I've watched this shift happen in real time. CISOs at organisations like OCBC, UOB, and the major insurance groups in Singapore are now genuinely Board-reporting positions — they present to risk committees, engage with MAS on regulatory matters, and carry accountability that no head-of-department role ten years ago carried. The compensation followed the accountability.

The Pipeline Problem: Security Expertise Takes Longer Than Code to Develop

The cybersecurity talent gap has been a headline for years, and the standard explanation is that there aren't enough people entering the field. That's partially true, but the deeper issue is that security expertise takes time to develop. You can teach someone to code in 6 months; you can't teach someone to think like an attacker in 6 months. The experiential learning curve in security is genuinely long, and the pipeline of senior professionals remains chronically undersupplied.

I've seen AppSec roles at DBS Bank, GovTech Singapore, and Standard Chartered stay open for 6+ months because the hiring team had a misaligned salary band — they were targeting a candidate at mid-level pay for a senior-level skill set. The market doesn't offer that combination.

Reading the Data for Your Specific Security Role

Cybersecurity salary data is particularly noisy because the function spans everything from GRC analysts to senior penetration testers. Use the FreeFindTalent Salary Check to get a specific benchmark for your role, city, and seniority level — and compare against both cybersecurity and general software engineering distributions.

The Market Signal Is Unambiguous: Pay Market Rate or Pay Twice

Cybersecurity is one of the most consistently well-compensated specialisations in technology, and the structural talent shortage means this is unlikely to change in the foreseeable future. For professionals considering entering the field, the investment in skills development pays off — literally. For hiring managers, the message is equally clear: pay at or above market, or watch your security talent walk to the company that will.

Why Underpaying Security Engineers is Expensive: A Real Case

A Singapore-based fintech tried to hire an Application Security Engineer at SGD 185K — which was below market for the role (the market range was SGD 210–260K). They couldn't hire anyone at that level. They then spent 8 months struggling with security reviews conducted by overworked engineers, eventually lost a contract with a major partner due to security audit findings, and had to bring in an expensive external security firm (SGD 600K+ engagement). By the time they hired an AppSec engineer 12 months later at SGD 245K, the lack of proper security infrastructure had cost them far more than the salary premium would have.

The shortage in cybersecurity means you either pay market rate or you pay the cost of not having the person at all.